Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Garcia

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 2000PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOYCE, J.:

¶ 1 This is a pro se appeal from the order of the trial court which denied the petition for permission to file post-sentencing motions/appeal nunc pro tunc filed by Appellant, Carlos Garcia. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. Before addressing the merits of Appellant’s claims, we will briefly recount the pertinent facts.

¶ 2 In August of 1993, Jose Maldonado and his friends were at a McDonald’s restaurant where they were accused by Appellant and his companion, Rolando Ortiz, of flirting with their girlfriends. A fight ensued during which…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. McClendonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. LantzySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. PeterkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. CabezaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JordanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. FairirorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Commonwealth v. EllerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. HernandezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. McGovern v. Hospital Service Ass'n of Northeastern PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API