Legal Opinion
Aikins v. Huff
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 11, 1928No. 18283PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, C.
The plaintiffs in error. Frank L. Aikins, Maud Aikins, and E. A. Aikins, began this suit by filing their petition, alleging that on th'e 12th day of November. 1925, one G. 0. Huff executed and delivered to W. J. Aikins his promissory note for the su,m of .$542.24, payable August 1. 1926, with 8 per cent, interest from date to maturity, and that, to secure this note, Huff executed to said Aikins a chattel mortgage on certain property therein described, and among this an undivided two-thirds interest in the wheat then growing on certain lands in Grant county, and that the mortgage was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kelley v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Smith v. LaFayette & Bro.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Wichita Mill & Elevator Co. v. Farmers' State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Neal Gin Co. v. Tradesmen's Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Schraeder v. GormleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Black, Sivalls & Bryson v. LoofbourrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- R-F Finance Corp. v. SummersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934