Legal Opinion
Neal Gin Co. v. Tradesmen's Nat. Bank
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 30, 1925No. 15404PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUTH, C.
The parties hereto will be designated as they appeared in the trial court. Plaintiff commenced this action in the district court of Love county, by filing its petition, wherein it alleges that T. A. Overstreet on April 17, 1922, executed his promissory note for the principal sum of $1,086 and a chattel mortgage to seccure payment of the same, and delivered the note and mortgage to plaintiff for a valuable consideration. The mortgage was duly recorded in Love county on the date of its execution. That on November 29, 1922, plaintiff secured judgment against T. A. Overstreet…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Bristow v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Smith v. FieldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Johnson v. GrissardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888
- Varnum v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Smith v. LaFayette & Bro.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Livestock Credit Corp. v. CorbettIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
- Sanders v. C. P. Carter Const. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Sooner Broadcasting Company v. GrotkopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- First National Bank of Atoka v. Calvin Pickle Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Harp v. First Nat. Bank of AnadarkoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.