Legal Opinion
Kelley v. Hamilton
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 30, 1920No. 9699PublishedCited by 16 opinions
Error from District Court, Craig County: • Preston S. Davis, Judge. Action on note 'by John Hamilton against Lulu X. Kelley. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMcXEILL, J.
The defendant in error, the plaintiff below, commenced this action in the district court of Craig county against the plaintiff in error, the defendant below, to recover on a certain promissory note. The parties will be referred to in the same position they occupied in the court below, the plaintiff in error as defendant, and the defendant in error as plaintiff. The note sued' upon is as follows :
“?778.25. Jan. 21, 1012.
“Feb. 10, 1013, providing entire house is completed satisfactory as per contract and specification, for work on house received, I. we, or either of us, jointly or severally,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Solts v. Southwestern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Wiebener v. PeoplesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Robinson v. BeatySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Taylor v. Long-Bell Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
3Cited by16 opinions
- Marland Refining Co. v. DuffySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Ginner & Miller Publishing Co. v. N. S. Sherman MacHine & Iron WorksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Kramer v. Nichols-Chandler Home Building & Brokerage Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- O. Q. Kizziar and Mildred Kizziar, His Wife v. B. L. Dollar, an Individual Doing Business as B. L. Dollar Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Busboom v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.