Legal Opinion

Belle Terre Ranch, Inc. v. Wilson

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 13, 2015No. A137217PublishedCited by 2 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BOLANOS, J. *

This case involves a boundary dispute between a Healdsburg vineyard and the winery operators on the adjacent property. After a bench trial, the court ruled in favor of the vineyard, quieting title in its favor and granting permanent injunctive relief against further trespass by the vintners. The court also awarded $1 in nominal damages for past trespass, and upon that basis awarded the vineyard its attorney fees in the amount of nearly $117,000 under Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 1021.9. We affirm the judgment insofar as it resolved the boundary dispute, enjoined…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Intel Corp. v. HamidiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Quarterman v. KefauverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Price v. McComishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Western Decor & Furnishings Industries, Inc. v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kelly v. HouseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  2. Richards v. Department of Building Inspection of The City and County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API