Legal Opinion

Doe v. Dep't of Children & Family Servs.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided June 20, 2019No. B276699PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBigelow, P. J.

*68*679Jane Doe appeals from a judgment of nonsuit and postjudgment awards of attorney fees and costs. Doe sued the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) as well as a private foster care agency for negligence and failure to perform statutorily mandated duties, which she claims resulted in sexual abuse by her foster mother's two sons. Doe contends the defendants were not entitled to nonsuit and that the trial court erred when it denied her request to file a fifth amended complaint, admitted evidence of consent, and awarded attorney fees and costs to the defendants.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Nally v. Grace Community ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Benach v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Wiener v. Southcoast Childcare Centers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Carson v. Facilities Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Dailey v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. A.L. v. Harbor Developmental Disabilities FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  2. Assn. for L.A. Deputy Sheriffs v. MaciasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. Banda v. Wash CA5California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Hooked Media Group, Inc. v. Apple Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Munro v. First American Title CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API