Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. Arnold Eng'g Co.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided December 19, 2018No. D070763PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaller, J.

*102The Orange County Water District (the District) appeals a postjudgment order awarding The Arnold Engineering Company (Arnold) approximately $615,000 in costs of proof under Code of Civil Procedure section 2033.420 based on the District's failure to admit certain fact-specific requests for admission (RFAs) during discovery.1 The District contends the trial court erred in making the award because (1) the District had reasonable grounds to believe it would prevail on the matters at issue under *103*356section 2033.420, subdivision (b)(3), and (2) even if it did not, Arnold did not adequately…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. People v. LeybaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. People v. CromerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. RoldanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Samsky v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Bruno v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  3. Fuller v. Campos CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Gamo v. MerrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  5. Samsky v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API