Still v. Wilkens
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Busk. Tried below before tlie Hon. J. G. Hazlewood. In this case the errors assigned were twenty-five in number. Those considered by the court will be sufficiently apparent from the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Stayton, Associate Justice.
appellees brought an action against Gabrielsky & Friedlander and sued out an attachment under which the property in controversy was seized. The appellant instituted this proceeding to try the right of property, claiming as assignee under a former assignment made by Gabrielsky for the benefit of such *717creditors as would consent to take under it and release him. The assignment made by Gabrielsky only purports to convey his own property, and it is claimed by the appellees that the assignment interposed no obstacle to their attachment, for that they assert that the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Donoho v. Fish Bros. & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1882
- Latham v. SelkirkTexas Supreme Court · 1854
3Cited by23 opinions
- Associated Oil Co. v. HartTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Focke, Wilkens & Lange & Scott v. Leon & BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Camden Fire Ins. Co. v. YarbroughTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
- Smith v. PattonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Saner-Whiteman Lumber Co. v. Texas & N. O. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.