Legal Opinion
Saner-Whiteman Lumber Co. v. Texas & N. O. Ry. Co.
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided November 17, 1926No. 683-4589PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, P. J.
On June 1, 1905, defendant in error executed a written contract with the predecessor of plaintiff in error, under which the former leased the latter 15 miles of steel rails for a rental of .$100 per mile per annum. It was agreed at the termination of the contract, as found by the trial court:
“That said contract was to continue for a period of 15 years beginning June 1, 1905, unless sooner terminated, and, should said lumber company’s supply of timber be exhausted before the expiration of said period, it should have the right to terminate said contract after the expiration of 5 years by giving…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- W.D. Yett, Mayor v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- Associated Oil Co. v. HartTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Dunn v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1908
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. Eastern Texas RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Silliman v. GanoTexas Supreme Court · 1897
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Humble Exploration Co. v. Browning, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
- First Nat. Bank of Corsicana v. ZarafonetisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Houston Sash & Door Company, Inc. v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Iowa Manufacturing Co. v. Weisman Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. JeffreyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.