Legal Opinion

Smith v. Patton

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided May 17, 1922No. 280-3521PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowelb, J.

The nature and result of this litigation have been admirably stated by the Court of Civil Appeals as follows:'

“This suit was instituted by Ben W. Smith, and after his death, pendente lite, prosecuted by his executrix, against A. C. Patton, independent executor of the estate of Dr. E. G. Patton, and against said A. C. Patton and O. H. Patton, residuary legatees under the will individually. The petition, which was an amended one, asserted, as against the estate of Dr. E. G. Patton, an agreement, on the part of Dr. Patton, grounded upon a valuable consideration, to bequeath Ben W. Smith $10,000…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Silliman v. GanoTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Buzar v. First National Bank of GreenvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Baker v. ShafterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  4. Barnes v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  5. Blinn v. McDonaldTexas Supreme Court · 1899

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Associated Oil Co. v. HartTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  2. Williams v. Safety Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Johnson v. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the WorldCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Chapman v. KelloggTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  5. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. PerkinsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API