Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. C. B. Hebbard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court, and in its opinion rendered upon the former appeal. (Fox v. Sale etc. Min. Co., 108 Cal. 369.)
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The facts in this case were fully recited in the opinion given upon a former appeal (Fox v. Hale etc. Min. Co., 108 Cal. 369), and need not be repeated. Under the complaint a recovery is sought from the appellants in behalf of the corporation upon two distinct claims or causes of action, one for the difference between the amount paid by the corporation for the milling of the ores and the actual cost thereof, and the other for damages sustained by reason of imperfect and fraudulent milling of the ores. At the former trial of the cause, the superior court found that upon the first of these…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Zellerbach v. AllenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Carpentier v. GardinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- De Costa v. Massachusetts Flat Water & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1861
- Muller v. BoggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Beamer v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Sagadin v. RipperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Gray v. CottonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Michell v. OlickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Williams v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Burke v. NortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.