Beamer v. Freeman
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Gibson, C.
Action of replevin. Judgment passed for defendant, from which the plaintiff appeals.
November 4, 1882, Jeans executed and delivered to defendant a chattel mortgage of a portable steam-engine then in Yolo County, to secure the payment of a promissory note for $1,150. This mortgage was not recorded until August 13, 1886, when it was placed of record in Yolo County, and on the sixteenth day of the same *556month it was recorded in San Joaquin County, Jeans having on the 1st of the same month, in the same year, removed the engine to the latter county.
August 11, 1886, Baker & Hamilton,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Berson v. NunanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Shipman v. Ætna InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1860
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cardenas v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- First National Bank v. MenkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Alferitz v. IngallsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1897
- McFadden v. BlockerCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.