Legal Opinion

Elk Hills Power v. Board of Equalization

California Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 2013No. S194121PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

This case presents questions regarding how the Board of Equalization (Board) may assess the value of an electric powerplant for purposes of property taxation. The issue is complicated by the circumstance that, with exceptions not relevant here, assessors may not include the value of intangible assets and rights in the value of taxable property. (Cal. Const., art. XIII, § 2; Rev. & Tax. Code, §§ 110, 212; Roehm v. County of Orange (1948) 32 Cal.2d 280 [196 P.2d 550] (Roehm).) In this case, the power company purchased “emission reduction credits” (ERCs)—credits the company had to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Cleveland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Reid v. Google, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
  5. De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Union of Med. Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Salas v. Sierra Chemical Co.California Supreme Court · 2014
  3. B.H. v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  4. California Chamber of Commerce v. State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. Atempa v. Pedrazzani, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API