Legal Opinion

United States v. Arthur J. Porth

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 18, 1970No. 1-68_1PublishedCited by 245 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PICKETT, Circuit Judge.

On December 1, 1966 the appellant, Arthur J. Porth, was charged in a five count indictment with the failure to deduct from employees’ wages and account to the Internal Revenue Service required withholding taxes, failure to file withholding tax returns, and his individual tax return for the year 1963, 1 in viola tion of 26 U.S.C. §§ 7202 and 7203. Following a conviction on all five counts the sentence announced by the court was “for the maximum period authorized by law on each count and for a study as described in 18 U.S.C. § 4208(c),” all to run concurrently. 2…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Commissioner v. AckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Florsheim Brothers Drygoods Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. United States v. Joseph A. Chase, United States of America v. Robert H. Parrish, United States of America v. Wyatt J. Roy, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  5. United States v. Sferas (Two Cases). United States v. SkallyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by245 opinions

  1. Gajewski v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
  2. Cupp v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
  3. William H. And Avilda L. Edwards v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. Hatfield v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
  5. Jarvis v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982

240 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API