Legal Opinion

United States v. Stacey C. Koon, Cross-Appellee. United States of America v. Laurence M. Powell, Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 19, 1994No. 93-50561, 93-50608, 93-50562 and 93-50609PublishedCited by 228 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Stacey Koon and Laurence Powell (“appellants”) appeal their jury convictions for deprivation of rights under color of state law in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242. The United States appeals Koon’s and Powell’s sentences under the Sentencing Guidelines. We affirm the convictions but remand for resentencing.

BACKGROUND

The arrest of Rodney King occurred in the early morning of March 3,1991 in Los Ange-les. After drinking malt liquor with two friends, King left a suburb of Los Angeles and began driving. At this time he was intoxicated. Officers Melanie Singer and Tim Singer,…

2Cases cited133 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by228 opinions

  1. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. United States v. Lavern Hankey, AKA Poo, OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Cunningham v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. People v. MayfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Kennedy v. City of RidgefieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

223 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API