Legal Opinion

Pennington Furniture Co. v. Herman Miller Furniture Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 15, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.

Prior to 1931 section 48 of the Municipal Court Code provided that where an attachment was granted in that court, and the defendant had no place of residence in the city of New York service of process might be effected by leaving a copy of the summons, warrant and inventory with the person in whose possession the property attached was found. In this form the section was declared unconstitutional. (Nerenberg v. Keith, 101 Misc. 551; Drew v. Northwestern Corp., 133 id. 706; Mayefsky v. Davis, 139 id. 506.) By chapter 576 of the Laws of 1931 section 48 was amended so as to add the requirement…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Happy v. . MosherNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Shushereba v. AmesNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Heihs v. ReinbergAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1930
  5. Nurenberg v. KeithAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Long Island Machinery & Equipment Co. v. JacobsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API