Legal Opinion
Heihs v. Reinberg
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided May 22, 1930PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBijur, J.
The question raised on this appeal is whether the Municipal Court of the City of New York has jurisdiction of an action arising under section 285-a of the Highway Law (now section 52 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law), where the initial service of the summons is required to be and is made upon the Secretary of State at Albany. The statute is the one which provides that a *816non-resident automobilist driving within this State shall be presumed to have appointed the Secretary of State to be his true and lawful attorney to the end that a summons served by “ leaving a copy thereof, * * * with the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Worthington v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- American Historical Society, Inc. v. GlennNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Lewkowicz v. . Queen Aeroplane Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
- McKeever v. Supreme Court of Independent Order of ForestersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Keller v. American Sales Book Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1936
- Praete v. AdamsNew Rochelle City Court · 1938
- Salzman v. AttreanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1931
- Stoibor v. MarinacciAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1931
- Berkowitz v. DunphyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.