Legal Opinion
Shushereba v. Ames
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 10, 1931PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.
The defendant, appearing specially, has moved to set aside the service of the summons and com plaint in an action to recover damages for injuries suffered through a collision with an automobile which, it is alleged, the defendant negligently operated upon a public highway in this State. The defendant is a resident of California. The summons was not served upon her personally within the State of New York. In accordance with the provisions of section 52 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 71), it was served here upon the Secretary of State as the attorney of the defendant to receive…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Gesell v. WellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Gesell v. Wells, WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
3Cited by38 opinions
- Leighton v. RoperNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Wise v. HerzogCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Maguire v. Yellow Taxicab Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Carroll v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
- Davidson v. Henry L. Doherty & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1932
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.