Attorney Grievance Commission v. Jacob
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
Bar Counsel, acting pursuant to the provisions of Maryland Rule BV9, filed a petition with us seeking disciplinary action against Felix Saul Jacob, a member of the Maryland Bar since November 3, 1955. He charged that Jacob violated Disciplinary Rule 1-102(A)(1), (3), (4), (5), and (6). 1 This action was based upon the conviction of Jacob in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland of subscribing to a false federal income tax return for the year 1975 in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1). 2 We shall disbar.
I
Pursuant to Rule BV9 b we referred the matter for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Bar Ass'n v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. NothsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Fellner v. Bar Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Bar Ass'n of Balto. City v. SiegelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WintersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. HoangCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985