Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Jacob

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 29, 1985No. Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 21, September Term, 1984PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Bar Counsel, acting pursuant to the provisions of Maryland Rule BV9, filed a petition with us seeking disciplinary action against Felix Saul Jacob, a member of the Maryland Bar since November 3, 1955. He charged that Jacob violated Disciplinary Rule 1-102(A)(1), (3), (4), (5), and (6). 1 This action was based upon the conviction of Jacob in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland of subscribing to a false federal income tax return for the year 1975 in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1). 2 We shall disbar.

I

Pursuant to Rule BV9 b we referred the matter for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Bar Ass'n v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. NothsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. Fellner v. Bar Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  5. Bar Ass'n of Balto. City v. SiegelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WintersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HoangCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API