Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Newman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 5, 1985No. Misc. (Subtitle BV) No. 13 September Term, 1984PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Bar Counsel, acting pursuant to the provisions of Maryland Rule BV9, filed a petition with us seeking disciplinary action against John Henry Newman, Jr., a member of the Maryland Bar since June 20, 1974. The complaint was based upon Newman’s conviction in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey of violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 and 1342 (mail fraud and aiding and abetting). Upon the basis of this conviction we had suspended Newman from the practice of law in Maryland under Rule BV16 prior to that petition. We shall disbar.

Pursuant to Rule BV9 b we referred…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. NothsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KerpelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FlynnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Clemson v. Butler Aviation-Friendship, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SparrowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SaulCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. BereanoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WintersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MazelisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API