Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Bennett
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided October 2, 1985No. Misc. (Subtitle BV) No. 2PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
Bar Counsel, acting pursuant to the provisions of Maryland Rule BY9, filed a petition with us seeking disciplinary action against Stanley Y. Bennett, a member of the Maryland Bar. He charged that Bennett violated Disciplinary Rule 1-102(A)(3), (4), (5), (6). (The pertinent portion of the rule is reproduced in that part of the opinion of the trial judge which we shall quote.) The petition was based upon acts set forth in In Re Bennett, 301 Md. 517, 483 A.2d 1242 (1984), where we found that Bennett was guilty of misconduct as a judge of the District Court of Maryland for which he…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. NothsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KerpelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Balliet v. BALTO. CTY. BAR ASS'NCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- In Re Formal Inquiry Concerning Judge BennettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006