State v. Perryman
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, C. J.
Appellant presents 12 propositions of law.
I
In proposition of law No. 1, appellant claims the trial court violated his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights in allowing in evidence inculpatory double hearsay statements.
At the trial the state called Edward Duvall, Jr., a detective of the Akron Police Department, as a witness. Duvall related a conversation between appellant and another police detective, Captain John Traub. Over appellant’s objection, Duvall was permitted to testify that Traub informed appellant that his accomplices had been arrested, and both of them had identified him as the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- State v. McKelton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. JellsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. EvansOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. BarkerOhio Supreme Court · 1978
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.