Legal Opinion

State v. Eaton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1969No. 69-208PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gray, J.*

In his brief, defendant sets forth the following assignments of error:

1. The trial court erred in not excluding a prospective juror, challenged for cause, when said juror said on the voir dire that the defendant was guilty.

2. The trial court erred in excusing certain prospective jurors who said they were opposed to capital punishment but could join in a verdict resulting in the death penalty if there was justification from the evidence.

3. The trial court erred in admitting evidence of a prior hold-up allegedly committed by the defendant, which did not have probative value in the case…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Namet v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Hopt v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. State v. HuffmanOhio Supreme Court · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. State v. GetsyOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. HaleOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. TylerOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. PoindexterOhio Supreme Court · 1988

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API