Legal Opinion

Ehle v. Looker

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1914No. Docket No. 54PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Clare; Dodds, J. Bill by Alfred Ehle against William R. Looker and Lousina Looker to foreclose a deed as a mortgage. From a decree for complainant, defendant Lousina Looker appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

In this case the bill of complaint was filed to have a certain deed declared to be a mortgage, and to foreclose the same. The defendants are husband and wife, and owned the land in question, 80 acres, as tenants by the entireties. The dealings between the parties leading up to this suit are substantially as follows: In April, 1910, defendant William R. Looker came to complainant and stated that he desired to borrow $1,800, and to secure such loan would mortgage 120 acres of land, including the land *250here involved, and said defendant requested complainant to assist him in obtaining such loan.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Just v. State Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  2. People's Building & Loan Ass'n v. BillingMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Van Slyke v. RooksMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Kieldsen v. BlodgettMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Marx v. BellelMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lee State Bank v. McElhenyMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. New York Liff Insurance Co. v. Oates, Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1939
  3. Atwood v. SchleeMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Bennett v. HainesMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Collateral Liquidation, Inc. v. ManningMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API