Legal Opinion

Berger v. Sonneland

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 13, 2000No. 18163-4-IIIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKurtz, C.J.

During her initial appointment with Dr. John Sonneland, Suzan Berger revealed information about her medical and personal history. When questioned about her personal history, Ms. Berger said that she had previously been married to Daniel Hoheim, a physician in Montana. She described her relationship with her ex-husband as “extremely strained.” After meeting with Ms. Berger, Dr. Sonneland contacted Dr. Hoheim and discussed Ms. Berger’s use of pain medicines. Based on information provided by Dr. Sonneland, Dr. Hoheim filed a motion in a Montana court seeking to modify the custody orders relating…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Harris v. GrothWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Carson v. FineWashington Supreme Court · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Gracey v. EakerSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  4. Berger v. SonnelandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. Amaker v. King CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API