Harris v. Groth
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
This is a medical malpractice action which presents two issues. The first, an issue which has received great attention in the past decade, is whether the conduct of a health care provider is to be measured against the standard of care practiced by the profession or against a standard of reasonable prudence. The second issue is whether a nonphysician may give expert medical testimony in a malpractice action. We hold that, as enacted by the Legislature, the standard of care imposed upon health care providers is one of reasonable prudence and that nonphysi-cians, if otherwise qualified, may give…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Douglas v. BussabargerWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Egede-Nissen v. Crystal Mountain, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
- Walker v. BangsWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Allison v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1965
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.