Legal Opinion

Harris v. Groth

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1983No. 48870-3PublishedCited by 118 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

This is a medical malpractice action which presents two issues. The first, an issue which has received great attention in the past decade, is whether the conduct of a health care provider is to be measured against the standard of care practiced by the profession or against a standard of reasonable prudence. The second issue is whether a nonphysician may give expert medical testimony in a malpractice action. We hold that, as enacted by the Legislature, the standard of care imposed upon health care providers is one of reasonable prudence and that nonphysi-cians, if otherwise qualified, may give…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Douglas v. BussabargerWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Egede-Nissen v. Crystal Mountain, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Walker v. BangsWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Allison v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1965

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by118 opinions

  1. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001

113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API