Legal Opinion

Gracey v. Eaker

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 19, 2002No. SC00-153PublishedCited by 147 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

837 So.2d 348 (2002)

Donna GRACEY and Joseph Gracey, Petitioners,

v.

Donald W. EAKER, Respondent.

No. SC00-153.

Supreme Court of Florida.

December 19, 2002.

Nolan Carter and Karen R. Wasson, Orlando, FL, for Petitioners.

James B. Thompson of Thompson, Goodis, Thompson, Groseclose & Richardson, P.A., St. Petersburg, FL, for Respondent.

LEWIS, J.

We have for review Gracey v. Eaker, 747 So.2d 475 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), in which the district court affirmed the dismissal of an action initiated by the petitioners, Donna and Joseph Gracey ("Graceys"), a couple allegedly injured by the counseling activities of a…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Pariente; Concurrence · Pariente; Dissent; Concurrence · Wells.

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Boyles v. KerrTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. McCain v. Florida Power CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. Paugh v. HanksOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Molien v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Johnson v. Ruark Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by147 opinions

  1. Clay Elec. Co-Op., Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  2. Osborne v. KeeneyKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Florida Dept. of Corrections v. AbrilSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  4. Natalie Slaughter v. Des Moines University College of Osteopathic MedicineSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  5. Cortez v. Palace Resorts, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2013

142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API