Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Berger v. Sonneland

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 13, 2000No. 18163-4-IIIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 P.3d 1187 (2000)

101 Wash.App. 141

Suzan BERGER, Appellant,

v.

John SONNELAND, M.D., Respondent.

No. 18163-4-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Eight.

June 13, 2000.

Brad E. Smith, Huppin, Ewing, Anderson & Paul, Spokane, for Appellant.

Brian T. Rekofke, Witherspoon, Kelley, Davenport & Toole, Spokane, for Respondent.

KURTZ, C.J.

During her initial appointment with Dr. John Sonneland, Suzan Berger revealed information about her medical and personal history. When questioned about her personal history, Ms. Berger said that she had previously been married to Daniel Hoheim, a physician…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Harris v. GrothWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Carson v. FineWashington Supreme Court · 1994

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Gracey v. EakerSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  4. Amaker v. King CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2007
  5. Mayer v. HuesnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API