Legal Opinion

Cole v. Weber

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 25, 1924No. Civ. No. 4112PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

This action is predicated upon a refusal of payment of a cheek given in part payment for 1,387 orange trees of nursery stock. Right of recovery in plaintiff depends upon whether or not the trees were warranted by him to be free from scale. The findings of the trial court were to the effect that the trees were so warranted, but, as a matter of fact, that the trees were so diseased. Judgment was ordered in favor of defendant, and plaintiff appeals therefrom.

Appellant’s sole point in substance is that the evidence does not justify the conclusion that plaintiff warranted the trees to be free from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Polhemus v. HeimanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Firth v. RichterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Griswold v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. McLennan v. OhmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Rauth v. Southwest Warehouse Co.California Supreme Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stott v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Hayman v. ShoemakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Chamberlain Co. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Steiner v. JarrettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API