Legal Opinion
McMinn v. City of Oklahoma City
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 23, 1997No. 86189, 86226PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Vice Chief Justice.
¶ 1 Two appeals arising out of the same litigation are disposed of in this opinion. The essential questions are (1) is the estate of a former City County Health Department employee entitled to the retirement benefits he would have received had he been simply a City employee? (2) Did the employee’s, estate have due process in the trial court’s calculation of the amount due? (3) May one division of the Court of Civil Appeals in essence overrule another division of that court on an issue that has become the law of the case? Our answers are yes, no, and no, in that…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Handy v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Matter of Estate of MaherasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Dominion Bank of Middle Tennessee v. MastersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Matter of Estate of EversoleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Morales v. CITY OF OKL. CITY EX REL. OKL. CITY POLICE DEPT.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- HALL v. THE GEO GROUP, INCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- TRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH v. BROTHERHOOD MUTUAL INSURANCE SERVICES, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Barringer v. Baptist Healthcare of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Gabler v. Holder and Smith, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.