Legal Opinion
HALL v. THE GEO GROUP, INC
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 1, 2014No. 112222PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAUGER, J:
T1 The dispositive issue presented is whether the plaintiffs negligence action should be dismissed as untimely brought. We hold that, pursuant to 57 O.S8.2011 § 566.4, compliance with the notice provisions of the Governmental Tort Claims Act (GTCA) is required for a prisoner, or former prisoner, to bring a tort action against a private correctional facility. 1 The notice required by the GTCA is a mandatory prerequisite jurisdictional requirement 2 to filing a claim for tort damages. 3 Because Hall did not comply with the notice requirements and the notice of claim requirement of the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Bartlett v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Cate v. Archon Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Robinson v. Central Brass Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Black v. Ball Janitorial Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Broadway Clinic v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- DUTTON v. CITY OF MIDWEST CITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- TRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH v. BROTHERHOOD MUTUAL INSURANCE SERVICES, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- GRISHAM v. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- I. T. K. v. MOUNDS PUBLIC SCHOOLSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- KRIMBILL v. TALARICOCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.