Handy v. City of Lawton
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Vice Chief Justice.
The threshold issue in this case is whether, on a second appeal, the Court of Appeals was bound by its decision in the first appeal. We answer in the affirmative. After the district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants, the plaintiff appealed. The Court of Appeals, Division 2, vacated the summary judgment and remanded the case. After the time lapsed for filing a petition for certiorari, that decision became final. After a jury trial, the case was appealed a second time. On the second appeal, the Court of Appeals, Division 1, rendered a decision…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Roach v. Atlas Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- DENCO BUS LINES, INC. v. HargisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Mistletoe Express Service, Inc. v. CulpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Alan R. Folkestad, and Cross-Appellee v. Burlington Northern, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Fletcher v. Meadow Gold CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Hough v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Fent v. Oklahoma Nat. Gas, a Div. of OneokSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Harder v. F.C. Clinton, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Morrow Development Corp. v. American Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.