Legal Opinion

Matter of Estate of Eversole

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 25, 1994No. 77254PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice.

The issues presented on certiorari are (1) Is the district court’s decision that Otis H. Eversole [deceased, testator or Eversole] intended his estate’s contribution to his wife's marital deduction trust be in the maximum amount allowed under the Internal Revenue Code 1 [I.R.C.] at the time of his death clearly contrary to the weight of the evidence? (2) Are Otis Eversole, Jr., Anthony Eversole, and Mark Eversole [appellants or sons] pre-termitted heirs of Otis H. Eversole? We answer both questions in the negative.

I

THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION

Eversole’s will was executed on…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Panama Processes, S.A. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  3. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Reeves v. AgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  5. Burdick v. Independent School District No. 52Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Booth v. McKnightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  2. In Re Estate of HolcombSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  3. McMinn v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. Benjamin v. ButlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  5. Gay v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API