Legal Opinion
Siriotis v. Gramuglia
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 25, 1991PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
254 N.J. Super. 223 (1991)
603 A.2d 154
NICK SIRIOTIS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
GIUSEPPE GRAMUGLIA, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Bergen County.
Decided September 25, 1991.
Davis Saperstein & Soloman, for plaintiff.
Melli & Wright, for defendant.
BOGGIA, J.S.C.
This matter comes before this court by way of defendant's, Giuseppe Gramuglia (hereinafter "Gramuglia"), motion for summary judgment seeking to dismiss plaintiff's complaint contending it is barred by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8(a), the Verbal Threshold.
The facts may be summarized as follows:
On November 14, 1989, the plaintiff, Nick Siriotis…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Saunderlin v. E.I. Dupont Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Filippo v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Shanley & Fisher, PC v. SisselmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Oswin v. ShawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Polaroid Corp. v. Rollins Environmental Services (NJ), Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Brooks v. OdomSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Dyszel v. MarksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Rose Dyszel and Robert Dyszel, H/w, Michele Dyszel and Michael Dyszel, H/w v. Rosie Marks, Defendant/third-Party v. Tim's Auto Service Tim Doe, Third-Party Michele Dyszel, Daniel Tumolo and Leslie Tumolo, H/w v. Andrew Brogan, IIICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993