Legal Opinion
Dyszel v. Marks
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 14, 1993No. Nos. 92-5289, 92-5334PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*119OPINION OF THE COURT
ATKINS, Senior District Judge.
This appeal presents the question of whether NJ.Stat.Ann. § 17:28-1.4 violates the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution. The statute limits the right of non-residents of New Jersey to sue for non-economic (pain and suffering) loss by automatically assigning the so called verbal threshold tort option under N.J.Stat.Ann. § 39:6A-8(a) to out-of-state residents involved in accidents occurring in the State of New Jersey, solely on the basis of whether their automobile (auto) insurance carrier is authorized to transact business…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Wicker v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Larsen v. Senate Of The Commonwealth Of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Anker Energy Corporation v. Consolidation Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Whitaker v. DeVillaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Government Emp. Ins. Co. v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.