Rose Dyszel and Robert Dyszel, H/w, Michele Dyszel and Michael Dyszel, H/w v. Rosie Marks, Defendant/third-Party v. Tim's Auto Service Tim Doe, Third-Party Michele Dyszel, Daniel Tumolo and Leslie Tumolo, H/w v. Andrew Brogan, III
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
6 F.3d 116
Rose DYSZEL and Robert Dyszel, h/w, Michele Dyszel and
Michael Dyszel, h/w, Appellants,
v.
Rosie MARKS, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff,
v.
TIM'S AUTO SERVICE; Tim Doe, Third-Party Defendants,
Michele Dyszel, Appellant.
Daniel TUMOLO and Leslie Tumolo, h/w, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Andrew BROGAN, III, Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 92-5289, 92-5334.
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
Sept. 22, 1993.
Sur Petition for Rehearing with Suggestion
for Rehearing In Banc Oct. 14, 1993.
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.