Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Gruss
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 9, 2012No. 11 Civ. 2420PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*655 OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Perry Grass (“Grass” or the “Defendant”) has moved to dismiss the amended complaint (the “Complaint”) brought by the plaintiff U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or the “Plaintiff’) for failure to state a claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and for failure to set forth a plausible cause of action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a) and 9(b).
Upon the facts and conclusions set forth below, the Defendant’s motion is denied.
I. Prior Proceedings
The SEC filed its initial complaint on April 8, 2011 seeking enforcement of the Investment Advisers Act of…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Ge Dandong v. Pinnacle Performance Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Loginovskaya v. BatratchenkoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- SEC. & Exch. Comm'n v. ScovilleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- U.S. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. AhmedDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.