Legal Opinion

Ge Dandong v. Pinnacle Performance Ltd.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 22, 2013No. 10 Civ. 8086(JMF)PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

JESSE M. FURMAN, District Judge:

In this putative class action, a group of Singapore investors (“Plaintiffs”) assert various claims against Morgan Stanley & Co. and certain of its affiliates (collectively, “Defendants”), related to a series of credit-linked notes (the “Pinnacle Notes” or the “Notes”) issued by Defendant Pinnacle Performance Limited (“Pinnacle”) and purchased by Plaintiffs. On October 31, 2011, the Honorable Leonard B. Sand — to whom this case was previously assigned— granted in part and denied in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint. See…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  5. McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Allied Dynamics Corp. v. Kennametal, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  2. City of New York v. GordonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  3. Allegany Capital Enterprises, LLC v. CoxDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2021
  4. Broker Genius Inc. v. Seat Scouts LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
  5. De Sangosse Agroquimica Ltda v. JDGU Investment LLC, et al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API