Ge Dandong v. Pinnacle Performance Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JESSE M. FURMAN, District Judge:
In this putative class action, a group of Singapore investors (“Plaintiffs”) assert various claims against Morgan Stanley & Co. and certain of its affiliates (collectively, “Defendants”), related to a series of credit-linked notes (the “Pinnacle Notes” or the “Notes”) issued by Defendant Pinnacle Performance Limited (“Pinnacle”) and purchased by Plaintiffs. On October 31, 2011, the Honorable Leonard B. Sand — to whom this case was previously assigned— granted in part and denied in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint. See…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Allied Dynamics Corp. v. Kennametal, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- City of New York v. GordonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Allegany Capital Enterprises, LLC v. CoxDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2021
- Broker Genius Inc. v. Seat Scouts LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- De Sangosse Agroquimica Ltda v. JDGU Investment LLC, et al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.