Legal Opinion
SEC. & Exch. Comm'n v. Scoville
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 24, 2019No. 17-4059PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
*1209This case involves an alleged worldwide Ponzi scheme and the antifraud provisions of the federal Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Defendant Charles Scoville operated an internet traffic exchange business through his Utah company, Defendant Traffic Monsoon, LLC. The Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") initiated this civil enforcement action, alleging Defendants were instead operating an unlawful online Ponzi scheme involving the fraudulent sale of securities. In this interlocutory appeal, Scoville challenges several preliminary orders…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Foxfield Villa Associates v. RobbenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- SEC v. Dale ChappellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
- SEC v. MorroneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Hamid Mohamed Ahmed Ali RehaifCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Universitas Education v. Avon CapitalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.