Legal Opinion

Galbraith v. Lunsford

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1888PublishedCited by 32 opinions

FROM KNOX. Appeal' from Chancery Court of Knox County. H. R. G-ibson, Oh.

1Opinion of the CourtFolkes, J.

This is an ejectment bill, the disposition of which was dependent upon a question of boundary.

After answer and proof the cause was submitted to Mr. Jerome Templeton, a solicitor of this Court, as an arbitrator, who was “ to hear and decide the same according to the law and the evidence.” The award was to be in writing, and was to be made the decree of the Court.

The arbitrator presented his award, wherein was stated his findings of fact and of law, adjudging that the bill should be dismissed.

Complainants excepted to the award upon the ground that the arbitrator manifestly undertook, as he was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Continental National Bank v. National Bank of the CommonwealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Blake v. HawkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Morrison v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Waring v. . SombornNew York Court of Appeals · 1880

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Rogers v. ColvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Goldberg v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
  4. Electric Light Co. v. Gas Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Engholm v. EkremNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API