Oliver v. Perkins
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to superior court of Grand Rapids. (Burlingame, J.) Case. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
Defendants are manufacturers of machinery at Grand Eapids, as copartners under the name ■and style of Perkins & Co. December 10, 1888, defendants entered into a written contract with plaintiff, relating to the sale of a mitre-cutting machine and a dado head and other novelties, by the terms whereof Perkins &" Co. agree to originate and perfect the machines. It provides that the patents shall be taken out in the name of Willis J. Perkins, and the title thereto shall vest in him; that the privilege of manufacture shall vest in defendants, but that no royalty shall be paid by plaintiff, except…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Allison v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
- Rich v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Chandler v. AllisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
- Allis v. McLeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Burrell v. New York & Saginaw Solar Salt Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1865
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Original Ballet Russe, Ltd. v. Ballet Theatre, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- American Const. Co. v. CaswellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Bazal v. Belford Trucking Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1977
- Bingham v. LipmanOregon Supreme Court · 1901
- Hearn v. RickenbackerMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.