Legal Opinion

Stockwell v. Crawford

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1911PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Mandamus by Leonard Stockwell against W. O. Crawford, District Judge of the Tenth Judicial District.

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

The plaintiff herein applied to this court for. an alternative writ of mandamus directing the Honorable W. O. Crawford, judge of the tenth judicial district, to immediately reconvene the district court for the county of Billings and proceed to the trial of the cause of Stockwell v. Haigh, by jury, without delay, and to fix some reasonable time and proceed to the trial of said cause; or to show cause for not obeying the command of the writ. The judge of that district made due return to the writ, and it rests upon us to determine whether the action of Judge Crawford in adjourning, sine die, the…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Andrews v. O'HEARNNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. ZiebarthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Burdick v. MannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  4. 501 DeMers, Inc. v. FinkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State ex rel. Red River Brick Corp. v. District CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API