Legal Opinion

Burdick v. Mann

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1931PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKenna, Dist. J.

Plaintiff instituted this action to recover the sum of $10,000, the alleged reasonable value of professional services which plaintiff claims to have rendered the defendant at her special instance and request in his capacity as attorney and counselor at law.

The answer of the defendant, while admitting the employment of the plaintiff as her attorney, denied the value of the services, and set up a counterclaim, alleging that she had been damaged by the carelessness and negligence of the plaintiff in handling her litigation in the sum of $173,000. The jury found against the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burdick v. MannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Walters v. RockNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Continental Supply Co. v. Syndicate Trust Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Henry v. MaherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Mann v. MannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Froh v. HeinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Gilbert v. QuinetArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Gravseth v. Farmers Union Oil Company of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Harper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  5. Otter Tail Power Company v. MalmeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API