Fiorini v. City of Kenosha
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.
The plaintiff offers no authority in support of his claim that the depreciation of fixtures and loss of profits are recoverable as damages. He goes on the general proposition that the damages recoverable in any action are compensation for the injury or loss suffered; claims that when profits are actually lost and depreciation actually suffered as a result of a tenant’s being ousted from leased premises, the amounts so lost and suffered can be recovered *498from the landlord if they can be proved with reasonable certainty and that they can be so proved in this case; and he assumes that the measure…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Des Moines Wet Wash Laundry v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- St. Louis, Keokuk & Northwestern Railroad v. Knapp-Stout & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- Bales v. Wichita Midland Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Mason v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
- Kafka v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Carazalla v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Reeves v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Maxey v. Redevelopment Authority of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Aero Auto Parts, Inc. v. State Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Williams v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.