Legal Opinion

I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Tee Pee Rubber Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 8, 1924No. 3961PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The Tee Pee Rubber Company started its business of merchandising rubber half-heels about the middle of October, 1919.' On April 3, 1920, in a cause then pending before him involving the. question .of infringement of appellant’s, patents for resilient heels by the appellee, the District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division/ issued an interlocutory injunction restraining the appellee from directly or indirectly making or causing to be made, using or- causing to be used, or vending to others to be used, in any manner, the half-heels theretofore sold by appellee. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davis v. SchwartzSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Russell v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Central Coal & Coke Co. v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  5. Furrer v. FerrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Louis H. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  2. Turner v. KirkwoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  3. Josephson v. Fremont Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  4. United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  5. Stoody Co. v. MikelsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API