I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Tee Pee Rubber Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
The Tee Pee Rubber Company started its business of merchandising rubber half-heels about the middle of October, 1919.' On April 3, 1920, in a cause then pending before him involving the. question .of infringement of appellant’s, patents for resilient heels by the appellee, the District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division/ issued an interlocutory injunction restraining the appellee from directly or indirectly making or causing to be made, using or- causing to be used, or vending to others to be used, in any manner, the half-heels theretofore sold by appellee. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Davis v. SchwartzSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Russell v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Central Coal & Coke Co. v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Furrer v. FerrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Louis H. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Turner v. KirkwoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Josephson v. Fremont Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Stoody Co. v. MikelsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.