Legal Opinion
Stoody Co. v. Mikels
District Court, S.D. California
Decided August 7, 1941No. 801PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, District Judge.
The motion of the defendants to refer to a special master the matter of an accounting to determine the amount of damages sustained by reason of the improvident issue of the preliminary injunction, filed on July 17, 1941, and hear'd and submitted on August 4, 1941, is now decided as follows:
The motion is denied.
Briefly we state the grounds.
The Court may, in its discretion, contemporaneously with the final decree, either in it or in a special order, refer to a master for determination the matter of damages which may have followed from the improvident use of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Russell v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Tyler Min. Co. v. Last Chance Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
- West v. East Coast Cedar Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1902
- I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Tee Pee Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
- Stoody Co. v. Carleton Metals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jamaica Lodge 2188 v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1961