Legal Opinion
Josephson v. Fremont Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 15, 1968No. 41078PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
The sole question raised on this appeal from an order denying defendants’ post-trial motion is whether the evidence is sufficient to support a jury verdict awarding damages to plaintiff claimed to have been caused by improper restrictions imposed on him and his assignors by a temporary restraining order.
Defendant Fremont Industries, Inc., is in the business of developing, manufacturing, and selling industrial chemical detergents and other specialized chemical products. During late August and early September of 1961, plaintiff and two of his assignors, Roland H. Hicks and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Flaugh v. Egan Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- AMF Pinspotters, Inc. v. Harkins Bowling, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Wood v. State ex rel. W. C. White & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
- Tyler Min. Co. v. Last Chance Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
- Blacktin v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. v. LoescherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Global Contact Lens, Inc. v. KnightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- Economy Gas Co. v. BradleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971