Legal Opinion
United States v. Murray
United States Court of International Trade
Decided March 21, 1983No. Court 82-2-00235PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion and Order
MALETZ, Senior Judge.
The United States brought this action against defendants John E. Murray, Jr., Stephen P. Hopkins and Paul C. Ryan to recover the value of merchandise allegedly entered in violation of section 592 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1592 (1976). 1 The Government alleges that defendants submitted false statements in 83 separate entries as to the value and country of origin of animal glue. Defendants Murray and Hopkins were indicted in connection with 21 of those 83 entries. Murray was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 542. 2 His…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. GordonUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- United States v. Valley Steel Products Co.United States Court of International Trade · 1990
- United States v. Optrex America, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2008
- United States v. RossUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.