Legal Opinion

Atlantic Richfield Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 24, 1984No. Court 81-1-00046PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion and Order

RESTANI, Judge.

In- this action, plaintiff challenges the Customs Service’s assessment of duty on Arconol, a blending component of motor gasoline. Plaintiff contends that Arconol was exempt from tariff duties at the time of entry under Presidential Proclamation 4655. Defendant contends that the proclamation did not suspend duties on Arconol. The parties agree that the application of the proclamation to Arconol is the only issue in this case. 1

President Carter issued Proclamation 4655 in response to the energy crisis of 1979 when oil and certain petroleum products including…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kokoszka v. BelfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. Yoshida International, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  3. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Federal Energy AdministrationTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Association of American Railroads v. CostleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. Siemens America, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2024
  2. Atlantic Richfield Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API