Legal Opinion
United States v. Ross
United States Court of International Trade
Decided November 28, 1983No. Court 83-3-00440PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CARMAN, Judge:
Plaintiff seeks to enforce a claim for penalties and duties concerning certain merchandise imported by defendants in 1978, asserting that false entry documents were filed by defendants resulting in an undervaluation of $304,611.78.
The United States Customs Service (Customs), pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1592 (1982) and the applicable regulations, issued on February 24, 1983 a prepenalty notice to defendants who duly responded. Customs issued thereafter on March 11, 1983 a penalty claim notice which indicated that any petition for mitigation or remission…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schweiker v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Loren S. Cheers v. Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare of the United States, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Forester v. Consumer Product Safety CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- United States v. MurrayUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. BlumCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Jac Natori Co.United States Court of International Trade · 1993
- Wally Packaging, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Pentax Corp. v. RobisonUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- United States v. BlumUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.